---
title: "North Carolina Trucking Email Security — 78.2% lack DMARC | EFROS"
description: "Email-security posture of 9,256 active motor carriers in North Carolina. 78.2% of domains have no enforced DMARC, 8.7% use p=reject. Free, public, source-cited."
canonical: https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/north-carolina/
---

- [Home](https://efros.com/)
- /[Research](https://efros.com/research/)
- /[US Trucking Email Security Index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/)
- /[By State](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/)
- /North Carolina

By State / North Carolina

# North Carolina Trucking Email Security

**78.2%** of active carrier domains in North Carolina have no enforced DMARC. That leaves freight operators open to email impersonation, payment-redirect fraud, and cargo theft via phishing.

Edition: 2026-Q2 State rank: #16 Carriers: 9,256 Domains: 7,893

By [Stefan Efros](https://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanefros-cyberdefense/), CEO & Founder, EFROS

Updated · May 19, 2026

No enforced DMARC

78.2%

national: 80.1%

p=reject

8.7%

national: 7.5%

Microsoft 365

36.2%

national: 38.1%

M365 + no DMARC (carriers)

2,028

national: 92,822

MTA-STS

3.1%

national: 3.3%

DNSSEC

7.2%

national: 6.1%

Dead domains

470

of 7,893 scanned

Total carriers

9,256

473 with dead domain

## Risk bands — North Carolina carriers

Carrier counts by risk band (composite email-security pain score). Critical = score 70+; Minimal = score <15.

| Risk band | Score range | Carriers | Domains |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Critical | score 70+ | 788 | 677 |
| High | score 50–69 | 2,730 | 2,271 |
| Medium | score 30–49 | 3,543 | 3,152 |
| Low | score 15–29 | 1,662 | 1,265 |
| Minimal | score

## North Carolina vs. national average

No enforced DMARC 78.2% vs 80.1% national

p=reject adoption 8.7% vs 7.5% national

MTA-STS 3.1% vs 3.3% national

DNSSEC 7.2% vs 6.1% national

## What the North Carolina numbers actually mean

**DMARC posture.** North Carolina's share of carrier domains with no enforced DMARC sits at **78.2%**, better than the national average by 1.9 points. North Carolina carriers adopt the enforced p=reject DMARC policy at a meaningfully higher rate than the national pool. At the protective end of the distribution, 8.7% of North Carolina domains are at p=reject, the only DMARC policy that actually instructs receivers to drop spoofed mail.

**Microsoft 365 surface.** Microsoft 365 mailflow adoption sits below the national rate, which shifts the remediation surface toward self-hosted and Google Workspace estates where DMARC has to be configured at the DNS layer rather than flipped on in a tenant policy. That share is **21.9%** of all North Carolina carriers — a one-flag-flip remediation set that any regional MSP or in-house IT lead can clear in a single quarter.

**Transport encryption.** MTA-STS adoption sits at 3.1%, materially below the threshold a freight payment-redirect attacker would have to clear to be inconvenienced by transport-layer policy. DNSSEC adoption in North Carolina runs at **7.2%** (vs 6.1% national), which matters for downstream DKIM and MTA-STS validation but is still a minority signal.

**Risk-band shape.** North Carolina's critical and high bands combine to 38.0% of state carriers, close to the national distribution, so remediation prioritization here should follow the same shape as the national program. The composite pain score blends SPF posture, DMARC enforcement, MTA-STS presence, and DNSSEC, so a carrier clusters in the critical band only when several controls fail together. Remediation that flips DMARC to enforcement plus turns on MTA-STS typically moves a carrier two bands down in one quarter.

**What this means for buyers and shippers.** If you are dispatching freight, settling broker payments, or receiving rate confirmations from North Carolina-based carriers, the operational exposure is the 78.2%of domains that cannot stop a stranger from sending email in the carrier's name. Payment-redirect and load-redirect fraud rides on exactly that gap. Verifying a counterparty's DMARC posture before a first wire (a 30-second DNS lookup) is the cheapest control in the freight stack.

## Compare North Carolina with other states

States closest in carrier-count rank to North Carolina. Each is scored on the same DNS-derived control set, so the comparison is apples-to-apples.

[### New Jersey Rank #1578.8% no DMARC · 9,844 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/new-jersey/) [### Indiana Rank #1776.3% no DMARC · 9,012 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/indiana/) [### Colorado Rank #1479.0% no DMARC · 10,031 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/colorado/) [### Maryland Rank #1878.9% no DMARC · 7,970 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/maryland/) [### Ohio Rank #1375.9% no DMARC · 11,310 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/ohio/)

[← Full US Trucking Email Security Index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/) [← All states](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/) [Switch to cargo-segment view →](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-cargo/)

## See where your own domain stands

The research is free and self-serve. Run the same public checks on your own domain in about a minute — SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, and more — and get a scored report by email. No agents, no credentials.

[Scan your domain free →](https://efros.com/tools/security-scan/) [Email security for fleets](https://efros.com/industries/trucking-company-msp/) [Talk to EFROS](https://efros.com/contact/?source=trucking-email-research)

Data as of 2026-05-20from public DNS measurements. Statistics are domain-weighted unless noted. State scope is the carrier's FMCSA-registered state. Methodology: [read the full index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/).
