---
title: "Rhode Island Trucking Email Security: 74.9% Lack DMARC | EFROS"
description: "Email-security posture of 1,069 active motor carriers in Rhode Island. 74.9% of domains have no enforced DMARC, 9.0% use p=reject. Free, public, source-cited."
canonical: https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/rhode-island/
---

- [Home](https://efros.com/)
- /[Research](https://efros.com/research/)
- /[US Trucking Email Security Index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/)
- /[By State](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/)
- /Rhode Island

By State / Rhode Island

# Rhode Island Trucking Email Security

**74.9%** of active carrier domains in Rhode Island have no enforced DMARC. That leaves freight operators open to email impersonation, payment-redirect fraud, and cargo theft via phishing.

Edition: 2026-Q2 State rank: #49 Carriers: 1,069 Domains: 987

By [Stefan Efros](https://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanefros-cyberdefense/), CEO & Founder, EFROS

Updated · May 19, 2026

No enforced DMARC

74.9%

national: 80.1%

p=reject

9.0%

national: 7.5%

Microsoft 365

41.2%

national: 38.1%

M365 + no DMARC (carriers)

281

national: 92,822

MTA-STS

3.6%

national: 3.3%

DNSSEC

3.3%

national: 6.1%

Dead domains

45

of 987 scanned

Total carriers

1,069

45 with dead domain

## Risk bands: Rhode Island carriers

Carrier counts by risk band (composite email-security pain score). Critical = score 70+; Minimal = score <15.

| Risk band | Score range | Carriers | Domains |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Critical | score 70+ | 89 | 79 |
| High | score 50-69 | 307 | 286 |
| Medium | score 30-49 | 407 | 383 |
| Low | score 15-29 | 208 | 182 |
| Minimal | score

## Rhode Island vs. national average

No enforced DMARC 74.9% vs 80.1% national

p=reject adoption 9.0% vs 7.5% national

MTA-STS 3.6% vs 3.3% national

DNSSEC 3.3% vs 6.1% national

## What the Rhode Island numbers actually mean

**DMARC posture.** Rhode Island's share of carrier domains with no enforced DMARC sits at **74.9%**, better than the national average by 5.2 points. Rhode Island carriers adopt the enforced p=reject DMARC policy at a meaningfully higher rate than the national pool. At the protective end of the distribution, 9.0% of Rhode Island domains are at p=reject, the only DMARC policy that actually instructs receivers to drop spoofed mail.

**Microsoft 365 surface.** Microsoft 365 mailflow adoption is heavier than the national distribution, which is consequential: every M365 tenant already includes the controls needed to enforce DMARC, so the 281 M365 carriers in Rhode Island with DMARC disabled are leaving paid-for protection switched off. That share is **26.3%** of all Rhode Island carriers, a one-flag-flip remediation set that any regional MSP or in-house IT lead can clear in a single quarter.

**Transport encryption.** MTA-STS adoption sits at 3.6%, materially below the threshold a freight payment-redirect attacker would have to clear to be inconvenienced by transport-layer policy. DNSSEC adoption in Rhode Island runs at **3.3%** (vs 6.1% national), which matters for downstream DKIM and MTA-STS validation but is still a minority signal.

**Risk-band shape.** Rhode Island's critical and high bands combine to 37.0% of state carriers, close to the national distribution, so remediation prioritization here should follow the same shape as the national program. The composite pain score blends SPF posture, DMARC enforcement, MTA-STS presence, and DNSSEC, so a carrier clusters in the critical band only when several controls fail together. Remediation that flips DMARC to enforcement plus turns on MTA-STS typically moves a carrier two bands down in one quarter.

**What this means for buyers and shippers.** If you are dispatching freight, settling broker payments, or receiving rate confirmations from Rhode Island-based carriers, the operational exposure is the 74.9% of domains that cannot stop a stranger from sending email in the carrier's name. Payment-redirect and load-redirect fraud rides on exactly that gap. Verifying a counterparty's DMARC posture before a first wire (a 30-second DNS lookup) is the cheapest control in the freight stack.

## Compare Rhode Island with other states

States closest in carrier-count rank to Rhode Island. Each is scored on the same DNS-derived control set, so the comparison is apples-to-apples.

[### Delaware Rank #4878.5% no DMARC · 1,159 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/delaware/) [### Vermont Rank #5077.9% no DMARC · 736 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/vermont/) [### South Dakota Rank #4772.2% no DMARC · 1,945 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/south-dakota/) [### District of Columbia Rank #5171.7% no DMARC · 212 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/district-of-columbia/) [### North Dakota Rank #4677.6% no DMARC · 2,035 carriers](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/north-dakota/)

[← Full US Trucking Email Security Index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/) [← All states](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-state/) [Switch to cargo-segment view →](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/by-cargo/)

## See where your own domain stands

The research is free and self-serve. Run the same public checks on your own domain in about a minute (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, and more) and get a scored report by email. No agents, no credentials.

[Scan your domain free →](https://efros.com/tools/security-scan/) [Email security for fleets](https://efros.com/industries/logistics/#trucking) [Talk to EFROS](https://efros.com/contact/?source=trucking-email-research)

Data as of 2026-05-20 from public DNS measurements. Statistics are domain-weighted unless noted. State scope is the carrier's FMCSA-registered state. Methodology: [read the full index](https://efros.com/research/us-trucking-email-security-index/).
