Skip to main content

By State / Michigan

Michigan Trucking Email Security

78.1% of active carrier domains in Michigan have no enforced DMARC. That leaves freight operators open to email impersonation, payment-redirect fraud, and cargo theft via phishing.

Edition: 2026-Q2State rank: #8Carriers: 13,943Domains: 11,471
By Stefan Efros, CEO & Founder, EFROS
Updated ·

No enforced DMARC

78.1%

national: 80.1%

p=reject

9.1%

national: 7.5%

Microsoft 365

40.3%

national: 38.1%

M365 + no DMARC (carriers)

3,355

national: 92,822

MTA-STS

4.2%

national: 3.3%

DNSSEC

5.1%

national: 6.1%

Dead domains

968

of 11,471 scanned

Total carriers

13,943

971 with dead domain

Risk bands — Michigan carriers

Carrier counts by risk band (composite email-security pain score). Critical = score 70+; Minimal = score <15.

Risk bandScore rangeCarriersDomains
Criticalscore 70+1,3281,028
Highscore 50–693,5783,032
Mediumscore 30–495,6484,553
Lowscore 15–292,2731,781
Minimalscore <15145109

Michigan vs. national average

No enforced DMARC78.1%vs 80.1% national
p=reject adoption9.1%vs 7.5% national
MTA-STS4.2%vs 3.3% national
DNSSEC5.1%vs 6.1% national

What the Michigan numbers actually mean

DMARC posture. Michigan's share of carrier domains with no enforced DMARC sits at 78.1%, better than the national average by 2.0 points. Michigan carriers adopt the enforced p=reject DMARC policy at a meaningfully higher rate than the national pool. At the protective end of the distribution, 9.1% of Michigan domains are at p=reject, the only DMARC policy that actually instructs receivers to drop spoofed mail.

Microsoft 365 surface. Microsoft 365 mailflow adoption is heavier than the national distribution. Every M365 tenant already includes the controls needed to enforce DMARC, so the 3,355 M365 carriers in Michigan with DMARC disabled are leaving paid-for protection switched off. That share is 24.1% of all Michigan carriers — a one-flag-flip remediation set that any regional MSP or in-house IT lead can clear in a single quarter.

Transport encryption. MTA-STS adoption sits at 4.2%, materially below the threshold a freight payment-redirect attacker would have to clear to be inconvenienced by transport-layer policy. DNSSEC adoption in Michigan runs at 5.1% (vs 6.1% national), which matters for downstream DKIM and MTA-STS validation but is still a minority signal.

Risk-band shape. 9.5% of Michigan carriers sit in the critical risk band (score 70+), above the national share of 8.4%. A disproportionate cluster carries simultaneously broken SPF, missing or monitor-only DMARC, and no MTA-STS. The composite pain score blends SPF posture, DMARC enforcement, MTA-STS presence, and DNSSEC, so a carrier clusters in the critical band only when several controls fail together. Remediation that flips DMARC to enforcement plus turns on MTA-STS typically moves a carrier two bands down in one quarter.

What this means for buyers and shippers. If you are dispatching freight, settling broker payments, or receiving rate confirmations from Michigan-based carriers, the operational exposure is the 78.1%of domains that cannot stop a stranger from sending email in the carrier's name. Payment-redirect and load-redirect fraud rides on exactly that gap. Verifying a counterparty's DMARC posture before a first wire (a 30-second DNS lookup) is the cheapest control in the freight stack.

Compare Michigan with other states

States closest in carrier-count rank to Michigan. Each is scored on the same DNS-derived control set, so the comparison is apples-to-apples.

See where your own domain stands

The research is free and self-serve. Run the same public checks on your own domain in about a minute — SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, and more — and get a scored report by email. No agents, no credentials.

Data as of 2026-05-20from public DNS measurements. Statistics are domain-weighted unless noted. State scope is the carrier's FMCSA-registered state. Methodology: read the full index.