Skip to main content

By State / Illinois

Illinois AI Vendor Governance

AI vendors evaluated against IL-specific frameworks — IL HB 3773 (AI Video Interview Act + AI in employment), BIPA (Biometric Information Privacy Act), IL Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), and the ISBA / ARDC AI Guidance (2024).

Illinois — vendors with explicit state engagement, ranked by 4 state-relevant governance axes.

Edition: 2026-Q2State: ILVendors: 30State-relevant axes: 4
By Stefan Efros, CEO & Founder, EFROSReviewed by Daniel Agrici, Chief Security Officer, EFROS
Reviewed by CSO ·

Why this state view

Illinois has BIPA — the most litigated state biometric privacy law in the US, with class-action exposure for face/voice biometrics in AI workflows. IL HB 3773 added explicit AI-in-employment disclosure. The ARDC + ISBA guidance bound lawyer AI use. Vendors deploying in IL need biometric handling clarity.

Primary frameworks anchored

  • IL HB 3773 (AI Video Interview Act + AI employment)
  • Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
  • IL Personal Information Protection Act
  • ISBA + ARDC AI Guidance (2024)

State-relevant scoring axes

Columns marked with an accent dot in the scorecard below are the axes most relevant to Illinois's regulatory frame. The state-relevance ranking in this view averages vendor performance across these axes only.

  • Training-data opt-out
  • Subprocessor list public
  • ABA Formal Op 512 readiness
  • NIST AI RMF self-attestation
Illinois vendor scoring — state relevance descending. Columns relevant to Illinois regulatory frame are marked with an accent dot.
#VendorIL Rel.ScoreGradeBAAOpt-outUS ResSOC 2ISO 42001NIST AICO AI§1557SR 11-7ABA 512SubprocTC
1Thomson Reuters CoCounsel88(4/4)80BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AN/AYesYes4/5
2Lexis+ AI88(4/4)76BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AYesYes4/5
3Westlaw Precision AI88(4/4)76BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AYesYes4/5
4Abridge83(3/4)87AYesYesYesYesPartialPartialPartialYesN/AN/AYes5/5
5FICO Falcon Fraud Manager + FICO Score AI83(3/4)80BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/AYes4/5
6Suki AI83(3/4)72BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialPartialN/AN/AYes4/5
7Nuance DAX Copilot (Microsoft)83(3/4)70BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoPartialN/AN/AYes5/5
8Salesforce Einstein / Agentforce83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoPartialPartialN/AYes5/5
9Glean83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
10Arctic Wolf83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
11Huntress83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
12eSentire83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
13Sophos83(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
14Unit2183(3/4)68CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/APartialN/AYes4/5
15Anthropic Claude83(3/4)58CPartialYesPartialYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
16Microsoft 365 Copilot75(4/4)75BYesYesYesYesPartialPartialPartialPartialPartialPartialYes5/5
17Harvey75(4/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AN/AYesPartial3/5
18Zest AI67(3/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/APartial3/5
19Upstart67(3/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/APartial3/5
20Google Gemini for Workspace67(3/4)58CPartialPartialYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
21OpenAI ChatGPT & API67(3/4)53DPartialPartialPartialYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
22ConnectWise67(3/4)50DPartialYesPartialYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/AYes3/5
23Ironclad AI63(4/4)63CYesYesYesYesNoNoNoN/AN/APartialYes4/5
24Hummingbird50(3/4)56CYesYesYesYesNoNoNoN/APartialN/APartial3/5
25Spellbook50(4/4)45DYesYesPartialPartialNoNoNoN/AN/APartialPartial2/5
26Heidi Health50(3/4)45DYesYesPartialPartialNoNoNoPartialN/AN/APartial2/5
27Notion AI50(3/4)33FNoPartialNoYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/AYes3/5
28Meta Llama33(3/4)25FNoYesYesNoNoNoNoN/AN/AN/ANo2/5
29Otter.ai33(3/4)25FNoPartialNoYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/APartial2/5
30Perplexity AI33(3/4)19FNoPartialNoPartialNoNoNoN/AN/AN/APartial2/5

How vendors score on Illinois's relevant axes

Yes / partial counts across the full 30-vendor pool, restricted to axes relevant to Illinois's regulatory frame. N/A axes are excluded from the applicable denominator.

Opt-out

Training-data opt-out

IL
Yes25/30 (83%)
Partial5/30 (17%)

Subproc

Subprocessor list public

IL
Yes21/30 (70%)
Partial8/30 (27%)

ABA 512

ABA Formal Op 512 readiness

IL
Yes4/7 (57%)
Partial3/7 (43%)

NIST AI

NIST AI RMF self-attestation

IL
Yes0/30 (0%)
Partial21/30 (70%)

Top 3 vendors on the Illinois-relevant axis subset

Buyer's guide for Illinois

For Illinois-deploying organizations, BIPA exposure is the binding constraint for any AI vendor processing voice, face, or other biometric data. Training-data opt-out and subprocessor transparency are the BIPA defensibility axes; class-action plaintiffs target subprocessor chain exposure aggressively.

Operationalize the scoring

Methodology — BIPA + IL HB 3773 scoring

The Index tells you which vendors clear the bar for Illinois engagement. The companion resource tells you how to turn that selection into a deployable governance program with documented evidence.

Methodology — BIPA + IL HB 3773 scoring →

Scoring as of 2026-05-13from public information (vendor trust portals, BAAs, SOC report cover pages, model cards, vendor documentation). Posture changes frequently — re-verify with the vendor's trust center before contract. State filter views surface vendors with explicit state engagement on the axes most relevant to that state's regulatory frame; they do not replace deployer-side state compliance work. Methodology: read the full methodology.

Turn the scoring into a deployable program

The Index tells you the posture. These engagements turn the posture into operational evidence for Illinois deployments.