Skip to main content

By State / New York

New York AI Vendor Governance

AI vendors evaluated against NY-specific frameworks — NYC Local Law 144 (Automated Employment Decision Tools), NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 (AI overlay for regulated financial institutions), NY State Bar Op #1224 (lawyer AI use), and the NY SHIELD Act.

New York — vendors with explicit state engagement, ranked by 4 state-relevant governance axes.

Edition: 2026-Q2State: NYVendors: 30State-relevant axes: 4
By Stefan Efros, CEO & Founder, EFROSReviewed by Daniel Agrici, Chief Security Officer, EFROS
Reviewed by CSO ·

Why this state view

New York has the most fragmented state AI regulatory landscape — NYC LL144 covers AEDTs, NYDFS Part 500 covers financial services, NY Bar #1224 covers lawyers, NY SHIELD covers data security. Vendors with broad NY engagement signal cross-domain governance maturity.

Primary frameworks anchored

  • NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT bias audits)
  • NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 (cybersecurity + AI overlay)
  • NY State Bar Op #1224 (lawyer AI use)
  • NY SHIELD Act
  • NY Civil Rights Law §52-c

State-relevant scoring axes

Columns marked with an accent dot in the scorecard below are the axes most relevant to New York's regulatory frame. The state-relevance ranking in this view averages vendor performance across these axes only.

  • ABA Formal Op 512 readiness
  • NIST AI RMF self-attestation
  • Subprocessor list public
  • Colorado AI Act readiness
New York vendor scoring — state relevance descending. Columns relevant to New York regulatory frame are marked with an accent dot.
#VendorNY Rel.ScoreGradeBAAOpt-outUS ResSOC 2ISO 42001NIST AICO AI§1557SR 11-7ABA 512SubprocTC
1Thomson Reuters CoCounsel75(4/4)80BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AN/AYesYes4/5
2Abridge67(3/4)87AYesYesYesYesPartialPartialPartialYesN/AN/AYes5/5
3FICO Falcon Fraud Manager + FICO Score AI67(3/4)80BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/AYes4/5
4Suki AI67(3/4)72BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialPartialN/AN/AYes4/5
5Lexis+ AI63(4/4)76BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AYesYes4/5
6Westlaw Precision AI63(4/4)76BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AYesYes4/5
7Microsoft 365 Copilot63(4/4)75BYesYesYesYesPartialPartialPartialPartialPartialPartialYes5/5
8Harvey63(4/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AN/AYesPartial3/5
9Zest AI50(3/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/APartial3/5
10Upstart50(3/4)74BYesYesYesYesNoPartialPartialN/AYesN/APartial3/5
11Nuance DAX Copilot (Microsoft)50(3/4)70BYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoPartialN/AN/AYes5/5
12Salesforce Einstein / Agentforce50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoPartialPartialN/AYes5/5
13Glean50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
14Arctic Wolf50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
15Huntress50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
16eSentire50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
17Sophos50(3/4)69CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
18Unit2150(3/4)68CYesYesYesYesNoPartialNoN/APartialN/AYes4/5
19Anthropic Claude50(3/4)58CPartialYesPartialYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
20Google Gemini for Workspace50(3/4)58CPartialPartialYesYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
21OpenAI ChatGPT & API50(3/4)53DPartialPartialPartialYesNoPartialNoN/AN/AN/AYes4/5
22Ironclad AI38(4/4)63CYesYesYesYesNoNoNoN/AN/APartialYes4/5
23ConnectWise33(3/4)50DPartialYesPartialYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/AYes3/5
24Notion AI33(3/4)33FNoPartialNoYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/AYes3/5
25Spellbook25(4/4)45DYesYesPartialPartialNoNoNoN/AN/APartialPartial2/5
26Hummingbird17(3/4)56CYesYesYesYesNoNoNoN/APartialN/APartial3/5
27Heidi Health17(3/4)45DYesYesPartialPartialNoNoNoPartialN/AN/APartial2/5
28Otter.ai17(3/4)25FNoPartialNoYesNoNoNoN/AN/AN/APartial2/5
29Perplexity AI17(3/4)19FNoPartialNoPartialNoNoNoN/AN/AN/APartial2/5
30Meta Llama0(3/4)25FNoYesYesNoNoNoNoN/AN/AN/ANo2/5

How vendors score on New York's relevant axes

Yes / partial counts across the full 30-vendor pool, restricted to axes relevant to New York's regulatory frame. N/A axes are excluded from the applicable denominator.

ABA 512

ABA Formal Op 512 readiness

NY
Yes4/7 (57%)
Partial3/7 (43%)

NIST AI

NIST AI RMF self-attestation

NY
Yes0/30 (0%)
Partial21/30 (70%)

Subproc

Subprocessor list public

NY
Yes21/30 (70%)
Partial8/30 (27%)

CO AI

Colorado AI Act readiness

NY
Yes0/30 (0%)
Partial8/30 (27%)

Top 3 vendors on the New York-relevant axis subset

Buyer's guide for New York

For NY-deploying organizations, governance focus splits by use case: employment AI vendors need LL144 audit posture; financial services AI vendors need NYDFS Part 500 + AI overlay; lawyer-facing AI tools need NY Bar #1224 alignment. Cross-cutting: subprocessor transparency and US data residency are NYDFS examination expectations.

Operationalize the scoring

AI Governance for Law Firms

The Index tells you which vendors clear the bar for New York engagement. The companion resource tells you how to turn that selection into a deployable governance program with documented evidence.

AI Governance for Law Firms →

Scoring as of 2026-05-13from public information (vendor trust portals, BAAs, SOC report cover pages, model cards, vendor documentation). Posture changes frequently — re-verify with the vendor's trust center before contract. State filter views surface vendors with explicit state engagement on the axes most relevant to that state's regulatory frame; they do not replace deployer-side state compliance work. Methodology: read the full methodology.

Turn the scoring into a deployable program

The Index tells you the posture. These engagements turn the posture into operational evidence for New York deployments.